Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue #2712: add overload to set custom uri functions on model scope #2715

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-7.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xuzhg
Copy link
Member

@xuzhg xuzhg commented Aug 7, 2023

Issues

This pull request fixes #2712.

Description

Add overload to add/remove Customized Uri functions.
The goal is:

  1. Enable customers to add/remove customized uri functions on model scope
  2. Avoid breaking changes
  3. Back-compatibility

Checklist (Uncheck if it is not completed)

  • Test cases added
  • Build and test with one-click build and test script passed

Additional work necessary

If documentation update is needed, please add "Docs Needed" label to the issue and provide details about the required document change in the issue.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 118 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Medium
Size       : +72 -46
Percentile : 43.6%

Total files changed: 10

Change summary by file extension:
.txt : +12 -12
.cs : +51 -17
.bsl : +9 -17

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@@ -7925,7 +7925,6 @@ public enum Microsoft.OData.Client.SaveChangesOptions : int {
BatchWithSingleChangeset = 1
BulkUpdate = 128
ContinueOnError = 2
DeepInsert = 256
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of previous commit forgot to update the bsl.

Comment on lines -8307 to -8308
public virtual void SetRelatedObject (object source, string sourceProperty, object target)
public virtual void SetRelatedObjectLink (object source, string sourceProperty, object target)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this?

@@ -7925,7 +7925,6 @@ public enum Microsoft.OData.Client.SaveChangesOptions : int {
BatchWithSingleChangeset = 1
BulkUpdate = 128
ContinueOnError = 2
DeepInsert = 256
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Undo this change since it is unrelated to this PR

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of previous commit forgot to update the bsl.

@@ -8237,7 +8236,6 @@ public class Microsoft.OData.Client.DataServiceContext {
public virtual DataServiceQuery`1 CreateQuery (string entitySetName)
public virtual DataServiceQuery`1 CreateQuery (string resourcePath, bool isComposable)
public virtual DataServiceQuery`1 CreateSingletonQuery (string singletonName)
public virtual Microsoft.OData.Client.DataServiceResponse DeepInsert (T resource)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Undo this change since it is unrelated to this PR

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of previous commit forgot to update the bsl.

@@ -8304,8 +8302,6 @@ public class Microsoft.OData.Client.DataServiceContext {
public virtual System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[Microsoft.OData.Client.DataServiceResponse]] SaveChangesAsync (System.Threading.CancellationToken cancellationToken)
public virtual System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[Microsoft.OData.Client.DataServiceResponse]] SaveChangesAsync (Microsoft.OData.Client.SaveChangesOptions options, System.Threading.CancellationToken cancellationToken)
public virtual void SetLink (object source, string sourceProperty, object target)
public virtual void SetRelatedObject (object source, string sourceProperty, object target)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Undo this change since it is unrelated to this PR

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of previous commit forgot to update the bsl.

@KenitoInc
Copy link
Contributor

Fix the public baseline files
There are tests that are still failing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CustomUri function related issues
3 participants