-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adopt first implementor's draft #6
adopt first implementor's draft #6
Conversation
…es_supported to clarify the purpose of the parameter
…roxy-vci` is not prepared in advance for that, so the implementation on the library side will be ported to `proxy-vci`.
…ed the type naming to make it clear that the data is after JWT decoding.
…when running `validateProof`).
…at it is not undefined.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are some simple things to check, so please check them.
Upon reconsideration, I feel that the timing of the validation might be inappropriate. |
In conclusion, I would like to keep the current implementation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Purpose
Main changes