-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ExplicitPhase #97
Merged
Merged
ExplicitPhase #97
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fixed embed-code calls to only use packages. Removed two burn orbit raise code while SNOPT is unavailable. Enabled doc-uploads. * disabled two burn orbit raise test without SNOPT * more fixes for doc building
…dymos (OpenMDAO#86) * adding SNOPT and caching * adding SNOPT and caching * playing with pulling out nested ifs
changing to full anaconda due to miniconda recent weirdness
missing semicolon
* fixed sign error when initial time or duration is unbounded. * enable bumpversion automatic commits * Bump version: 0.11.0 → 0.11.1 * missing run_model call in unbounded time test
…nlinearBlockGS or NewtonSolver
…. stage_control_comp interpolates the controls within each segment to the stage nodes for the ODE calls.
…ch phase for initial and final constraints, which more generally works with phases where initial and final values arent in the same vector (like ExplicitPhase)
…nal constraints and is compatible with ExplicitPhase
… openmdao recording in the hybrid case.
…rue for set_state_options in ExplicitPhase now raises ValueError. Need to implement boundary constraints for ExplicitPhase in order to solve the brachistochrone problem.
…rking in explicit mode
…alues at nodes="steps". It is unable to return state values and ode outputs at any other node subset. simulate_phase works for the brachistochrone explicit test.
…m within ExplicitPhase
… (NLRK and simulate within trajectories)
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds ExplicitPhase to Dymos, which implements single, multiple, and hybrid shooting. This capability is still under development and is not yet documented for public use. Notable features to be added: