Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PMID:27415408 Homozygous and heterozygous point mutations in succinate dehydrogenase subunits b, c and d of Rhizoctonia cerealis conferring resistance to thifluzamide. #188

Closed
MPiovesana opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 11 comments

Comments

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator

Curated by @MPiovesana
https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/a60cdca499c697ac

@MPiovesana MPiovesana self-assigned this Jul 19, 2023
@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper describing the generation of thifluzamide-resistant mutants of Rhizoctonia cerealis by UV-irradiation of wild type strains R1404, R1406 and R1410. Mutants are obtained which harbour point mutations in the target genes SdhB/C/D, and phenotypical characterisation is performed.

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Uniprot IDs: authors provide GenBank accession numbers for SdhB/C/D genes of Rhizoctonia cerealis, which were used to retrieve Uniprot IDs (indicated below). In Uniprot, entries are deposited as proteins of Ceratobasidium cereale (the teleomorph of Rhizoctonia cerealis).

SdhB = KU299049 - A0A173DSZ5
SdhC = KU299050 - A0A173DSZ3
SdhD = KU299051 - A0A173DT05

Strains: strains R1404, R1406 and R1410 were manually added to the curation session.

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Genotype creation: allele type amino acid substitution was used to create all mutant pathogen genotypes. Point mutations were recorded against each respective strain. Some mutations were present in more than one strain; to avoid several 'repeated' genotypes and annotations, each mutation was recorded once in a representative strain. As most of the mutants were heterozygous for the mutant alleles, I created diploid locus for all genotypes.

NOTE: @CuzickA I noticed that when a curation session contains more than one strain and a diploid locus is created, a random strain is automatically selected for the diploid locus, regardless of the one which had been selected during the creation of the haploid locus. Thus, I had to manually edit the strain in each diploid locus after their creation to ensure they were correct. Could be interesting to add this into the FAQ text.

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Genotype annotations: genotypes were annotated with terms:
resistance to thifluzamide (suggested)
resistance to boscalid
resistance to bixafen (suggested)
resistance to penflufen (suggested)
sensitive to flutolanil (suggested)
normal growth on flutolanil (suggested)

Annotation extensions were used to classify the level of resistance as low or medium according to the text.

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NOTE: The paper also reports on the mycelial growth and virulence of mutants; however, there is variability among mutants derived from the same parental strain and harbouring the same mutation, which makes annotation not so robust (although annotation extension has_severity variable severity could be used). However, the main focus of the paper is on the resistance to fungicides, which already yielded 30 annotations.

@MPiovesana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Curation completed pending review.

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Feb 6, 2024

Next - check genotype and phenotype annotations - Table 2 and 3

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Feb 9, 2024

Genotype and phenotype annotations look good.

Added in the new PHIPO and PHI-ECO terms.

Next steps

  1. add new strains_ added species 79869f1 and strains 70789f1
  2. try and add AE alteration in archetype

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Feb 9, 2024

AE alteration in archetype

Species 'Ceratobasidium cereale' not listed in Nichola's Table S4 or Mair et al 2016 Table of EPPO codes.

Looks like I'll have to try FRAST.

Generated AA FASTA files from Genbank entries
SdhB = KU299049 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU299049
SdhC = KU299050 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU299050
SdhD = KU299051 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU299051

SdhB+[WT level] / SdhB(aaH246Y)[Not assayed] 'H277Y; SdhB; PYRNTE'
image
image

SdhC(aaH139Y)[Not assayed] / SdhC(aaH139Y)[Not assayed] 'H134Y; SdhC; PYRNTE'
SdhC+[WT level] / SdhC(aaH139Y)[Not assayed] 'H134Y; SdhC; PYRNTE'
image
image
image

SdhD+[WT level] / SdhD(aaH116Y)[Not assayed] 'H134Y; SdhD; PYRNTE'

SdhD+[WT level] / SdhD(aaH116Y, L129I)[Not assayed] 'H134Y, 147I; SdhD; PYRNTE'

Check with Nichola if this alignment is good enough? L129I -> 147I

SdhD+[WT level] / SdhD(aaH116D, H118Y)[Not assayed] 'H134D, H136Y; SdhD; PYRNTE'

image

image
image
image

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Feb 9, 2024

Next steps

  1. Check AE alteration in archetype with Nichola.

Then session ready for approval.

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Sep 4, 2024

Session approved without Nichola checking AE alteration in archetype.
Closing ticket.

@CuzickA CuzickA closed this as completed Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment