This repository explores the possibility to package a C++ library for dual build mode: Either use it via classical header includes or via module import.
The goal is for code as this example to work:
#ifdef USE_MODULES
import myLib; // imports: myLib::{myFunc1, myFunc2}
#else
#include <myLib/header1.hpp> // includes: myLib::myFunc1
#include <myLib/header2.hpp> // includes: myLib::myFunc2
#endif
int main() {
myLib::myFunc1();
myLib::myFunc2();
}
The main motivation is to make use of possible compile-time reductions of module imports while still being backward compatible for older compilers. The changes to the original hpp/cpp files should be minimal and where possible, no duplication of code (even for declaring entities of the modules).
See this associated blog post explaining most implementation ideas.
There are multiple sub-folders, e.g. 01/, .., 06/. Every folder adds some new feature for a dual build mode of general libraries.
01/
: Just a simple "Hello World"-type module.02/
: Dual build mode of a trivial library containing only one function.03/
: Dual build mode of a trivial library in a style similar to the fmt library.04/
: Dual build mode with a separate module implementation unit.05/
: Dual build mode of a library containing multiple hpp/cpp files.06/
: Dual build mode of multiple libraries.07/
: Dual build mode where the import of external modules might appear multiple times (e.g. in primary module interface and in the implementation unit).08/
: Each cpp file is (conditionally) converted to a module implementation unit instead of a separate unity-build type module implementation unit.09/
: Create wrapper module explicitly stating each entity to export. Module has no implementations (non-ABI breaking).
- Daniela-E explains how she transformed fmt to use modules (alongside header build) on reddit.
- My blog post explaining implementation details.
- Reddit discussion about this dual build idea
- How to treat external libraries automatically (instead of checking a library specific macro multiple times)?
- Are there any issues with shared/static libraries?
- How should one treat the case when only part of the library has been modularized?
- Typical unity-build issues (e.g. static functions with the same name/arguments in different cpp files)?
- Discuss expected compile-time benefits/regressions
- benefit:
import
ing should be faster thaninclude
ing headers multiple times - regression: modularizing a library under development might be result in long compilation times of the module implementation unit
*module_impl.cpp
)?
- benefit:
- Investigate wrongful
include
ing of headers when the module was build instead (should not be possible for correctly set include directories)? - Does ccache work with modules in general?
- Can we import the same module in a primary module interface and in one of its module implementation units?
If so, then we could get rid of the ugly
ONLY_SCAN_OTHER_LIBRARIES_FOR_IMPORT
macro.- Answer: Yes! This reduces the amount of boilerplate ;)
- Try out
import std;
instead of scanning specifically for STD headers. - Investigate where external includes should go (global fragment vs module fragment).
To be explicit look at this pseudo example:
#include <LibA/someHeader.hpp>
being included in a module unit forLibB
. - Convert each cpp file into their own module implementation unit instead of a separate unity build type module implementation unit (possibly faster incremental build times).