Create LICENSE

[leggetter]

The posthog.com contents is under the following license:

# For content in the /contents/ folder

Copyright (c) 2020 

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

Should we consider some form of Creative Commons license?

[jamesefhawkins]

Happy to go with MIT.

Fun fact: The reason posthog.com isn't MIT, is that we had people (specifically, other open core companies, with similar investors and potentially similar customers) fork our repo to create their own startup (fair play though!), and an important part of our web design is to differentiate us.

[jamesefhawkins]

Done, given we're on a bias for action streak here... ;)

[leggetter]

The reason posthog.com isn't MIT, is that we had people (specifically, other open core companies, with similar investors and potentially similar customers) fork our repo to create their own startup (fair play though!)

That's great!

How about CC BY 4.0 to give the freedom of use but there's also some attribution?