Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename RedisFilesystem to RedisStorageContainer to match naming semantics of other filesystem classes #13771

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

bunchesofdonald
Copy link
Contributor

@bunchesofdonald bunchesofdonald commented Jun 4, 2024

@desertaxle I think this naming brings it inline with the others, thoughts?

Related to #12249

Base automatically changed from issue-12249-tests to main June 4, 2024 16:10
@bunchesofdonald bunchesofdonald requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2024 16:10
Copy link
Member

@desertaxle desertaxle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@desertaxle I think this naming brings it inline with the others, thoughts?

I think what I want is a block that does normal Redis stuff without our Filesystem methods and a block that is specific to our Filesystem interface that composed the normal Redis stuff block. I also think that we should build out this library and get the names sorted out afterwards because I keep second-guessing myself.

TL;DR: I'm good with this or RedisFilesystem, but we might want to revisit once we've built out more functionality.

@bunchesofdonald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agreed, this block alone is pretty sad for an integration, definitely should add more functionality.

@bunchesofdonald bunchesofdonald merged commit d3def50 into main Jun 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@bunchesofdonald bunchesofdonald deleted the issue-12249-rename branch June 4, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants