Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds access=permissive routability scenarios, see #3435. #3436

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

daniel-j-h
Copy link
Member

cc @MoKob

| primary | permissive | x |
| steps | permissive | x |
| footway | permissive | x |
| garbagetag | permissive | x |
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looked into this - this scenario is passing at the moment.

See #3435 for a discussion if it should pass or if the highway tag should take precedence.

@MoKob MoKob added the Review label Jan 12, 2017
@MoKob
Copy link

MoKob commented Jan 12, 2017

@daniel-j-h is this still an issue? can we simply merge this, or do you think this should produce different results. I can't really tell from the discussion in #3435

@daniel-j-h
Copy link
Member Author

The Wiki says one thing the real world data says another. #3435 is not resolved. My opinion is routing cars over steps makes no sense. Feel free to close this PR - we can revive it once we resolved #3435.

@TheMarex
Copy link
Member

TheMarex commented Feb 7, 2017

Replaced by #3668

@TheMarex TheMarex closed this Feb 7, 2017
@DennisOSRM DennisOSRM deleted the permissive-routability branch November 6, 2022 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants