Skip to content

Conversation

PyVCEchecker
Copy link

setting the keyword argument python_requires is a better way to declare Python compatibility #379

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling bd38115 on PyVCEchecker:master into be126ee on PyCQA:master.

Copy link
Contributor

@atodorov atodorov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

I'm not sure if we need to remove some of the trove classifiers or not though.

@carlio carlio force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 610b489 to 932cc0e Compare May 15, 2023 03:50
@carlio
Copy link
Member

carlio commented May 15, 2023

I'll close this as it is superseded, as I moved to poetry for packaging (partly due to pylint-dev/pylint-celery#14)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants