-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
document building FastRGF with Clang and AppleClang #319
Conversation
Hmmm, seems that compiled with Clang and AppleClang FastRGF binaries cannot pass our simple test during Lines 116 to 153 in 49756ae
Refer to the corresponding Travis jobs (with debug logs): https://travis-ci.org/RGF-team/rgf/builds/657496643 Although FastRGF compiled successfully
I guess this is somehow connected to #92. I also tried to decrease the lvl of compiler optimizations - no luck. So I'm going to revert the changes related to removal of used compiler restrictions in cc @ankane |
Thank you for your investigation and PR. |
@fukatani Do you mean to revert #316? I think we can leave the possibility to compile with AppleClang and Clang as it compiles successfully now
and we have the evidence of successful run: #316 (comment). So, I guess Clang-compiled binaries work well under the some conditions (maybe with large enough datasets). |
Ah, I see. |
Follow-up #316.