Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue466 tabula example #469

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2017
Merged

Issue466 tabula example #469

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2017

Conversation

PRemmen
Copy link
Member

@PRemmen PRemmen commented Jul 12, 2017

This solves #466 and adds examples for TABULA. In addition it solves problems with retrofitting tabula buildings and extends the retrofit tests

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 12, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.006%) to 96.638% when pulling 8d03e5a on issue466_TABULAExample into 8ef7dc3 on development.

@PRemmen
Copy link
Member Author

PRemmen commented Jul 12, 2017

I will add some tests to cover missing lines in project.py

@MichaMans
Copy link
Contributor

MichaMans commented Sep 6, 2017

@PRemmen should we add this test for now? And maybe implement further tests for increasing coverage? At the moment this should be fine for me. So this is Approved!

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 6, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.006%) to 96.638% when pulling c95f363 on issue466_TABULAExample into 9337429 on development.

@MichaMans
Copy link
Contributor

a slightly decreasing coverage will be fine. Should we merge this? @PRemmen

@MichaMans MichaMans assigned PRemmen and unassigned MichaMans Sep 26, 2017
@PRemmen
Copy link
Member Author

PRemmen commented Sep 27, 2017

thanks for approving @MichaMans

@PRemmen PRemmen merged commit f9d5b26 into development Sep 27, 2017
@PRemmen PRemmen deleted the issue466_TABULAExample branch July 4, 2018 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants