Fix &?ROUTINE and %?BLOCK falsely claiming to hold Subs

Author: niner

doc/Language/variables.rakudoc

@@ -1402,9 +1402,9 @@ $?BITS           Number of data-path bits of the platform the program is being c
 
 The compile time variable C<&?ROUTINE> provides introspection about which
 routine the program is actually within. It returns an instance of
-L<Sub|/type/Sub> attached to the current routine. It does support the method
+L<Routine|/type/Routine> attached to the current routine. It does support the method
 C<.name> to obtain the name of the called routine, as well as C<.signature> and
-others method related to C<Sub>:
+others method related to C<Routine>:
 
     sub awesome-sub { say &?ROUTINE.name }
     awesome-sub; # OUTPUT: «awesome-sub␤»
@@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ use the function name or L<C«samewith»|/language/functions#sub_samewith>.
 
 The special compile variable C<&?BLOCK> behaves similarly to
 C<&?ROUTINE> but it allows to introspect a single block of code.
-It holds a L<Sub|/type/Sub> and allows for recursion within the
+It holds a L<Block|/type/Block> and allows for recursion within the
 same block:
 
 =begin code