Skip to content

Commit 30206e4

Browse files
committed
Minor doc changes #3871
1 parent 52615ee commit 30206e4

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

xt/check-signatures.t

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -25,22 +25,22 @@ the signature does not automatically cause the test to fail: some differences in
2525
signature (such as different names for positional parameters) represent
2626
different implementation choices rather than an error in the docs.
2727
28-
NOTE: when you specify a rakudo source directory using the RAKUDO_SRC environment
28+
I<NOTE>: when you specify a rakudo source directory using the RAKUDO_SRC
29+
environment
2930
variable, this script will attempt to test a specific version by using git checkout
3031
to switch that checkout to a specific version during the test, and run
3132
"git checkout -" at the end to reset the state.
3233
33-
NOTE: This test uses introspection from the running copy of rakudo to find
34+
I<NOTE>: This test uses introspection from the running copy of Rakudo to find
3435
information in the source code. If you are running a different version of raku
3536
then the RAKUDO_SRC directory, it may be unable to find certain method definitions.
3637
3738
To ensure that implementation details don't cause failing tests, we check only
3839
for certain discrepancies that are guaranteed to indicate a
3940
substantive/non-implementation detail mismatch between Rakudo and the docs.
4041
41-
Currently, we only test for one category of discrepancies:
42-
43-
=item Methods that are defined with a specific invocant in Rakudo but not in the
42+
Currently, we only test for one category of discrepancies: Methods that are
43+
defined with a specific invocant in Rakudo but not in the
4444
docs (this helpfully also catches the situation where a documentation signature
4545
was I<intended> to have an invocant, but where someone forgot to end the
4646
invocant with a C<:>)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)