Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create footnotes showing contributor roles #34

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2020

Conversation

RaymondMichael
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@nspark nspark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two questions:

  • I wonder how these footnotes will look when, for subsequent versions, we use (mostly) the same section committees, but the contributors list spans multiple pages. For example, will the footnote for the OpenSHMEM Specification Committee Chair appear on multiple pages?
  • Do we want to order the footnotes themselves in the order their respective sections appear in the document?

@RaymondMichael
Copy link
Owner Author

Yah I realize I'm leaving a problem for future-me, but I don't know enough about TeX to do anything about it.

@nspark
Copy link
Collaborator

nspark commented Mar 31, 2020

@RaymondMichael I tried adding a couple of the noted positions to the listing of contributors to 1.4. It doesn't duplicate the note at the bottom, which leaves it somewhat unclear to what footnote the mark is referring. I'm okay deferring a fix until 1.6, though.

@RaymondMichael
Copy link
Owner Author

@nspark or @davidozog, I'll need one of you to approve this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@davidozog davidozog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me.

@davidozog
Copy link
Collaborator

@nspark @RaymondMichael In the next release, would it help to move the \footnotetext items a bit lower in this section so we could refer to it multiple times with slightly less confusion?

@nspark
Copy link
Collaborator

nspark commented Apr 2, 2020

@davidozog Maybe. We'll have to experiment a bit, but this looks good for 1.5.

@RaymondMichael RaymondMichael merged commit 7ff6bd3 into sec/frontmatter Apr 2, 2020
@RaymondMichael RaymondMichael deleted the RaymondMichael-patch-3 branch April 2, 2020 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants