We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reading the r-devel changes RSS feed has its benefits as I noticed the other day (Feb 4 to precise) that
CHANGES IN R-devel NEW FEATURES ‘qnorm(, log.p=TRUE)’ is now fully accurate (instead of to “only” minimally five digits).
And indeed, we now get
----- FAILED[data]: test_stats.R<246--246> call| expect_equal(runit_qnorm_log(-1e+05)$lower, -447.1974945) diff| Expected '-447.1974945', got '-447.197893678525' Error: 1 out of 1590 tests failed
Fix is easy and I'll push it once the CITATION issue in #1250 is dealt with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
132bcaf
Merge pull request #1252 from RcppCore/bugfix/qnorm_test
7fc0a8f
Use more accurate qnorm value from R 4.3.0 (Closes #1251)
No branches or pull requests
Reading the r-devel changes RSS feed has its benefits as I noticed the other day (Feb 4 to precise) that
And indeed, we now get
Fix is easy and I'll push it once the CITATION issue in #1250 is dealt with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: