fix: properly handle CellRenderCombo returning integers

[weibullguy]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

To properly handle the integer data type returned from CellRendererCombo's when they display string type information.

Describe how this was implemented.

Created lists containing the pick list strings for the CellRendererCombo. The returned integer value then represents the index in the list which can be used to select the proper text to display.

Describe any particular area(s) reviewers should focus on.

None

Provide any other pertinent information.

Closes #820

Pull Request Checklist

• Code Style

  • Code is following code style guidelines.

• Static Checks

  • Failing static checks are only applicable to code outside the scope of
    this PR.

• Tests

  • At least one test for all newly created functions/methods?

• Chores

  • Problem areas outside the scope of this PR have an # ISSUE: comment
    decorating the code block. These # ISSUE: comments are automatically
    converted to issues on successful merge. Alternatively, you can manually
    raise an issue for each problem area you identify.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.08%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.41 ⭐	1.36 ⭐	-0.05 👍
Method Length	110.13 🙂	108.95 🙂	-1.18 👍
Working memory	6.44 🙂	6.42 🙂	-0.02 👍
Quality	75.33% ⭐	75.41% ⭐	0.08% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	7768	7926	158

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hardware/panel.py	68.36% 🙂	69.53% 🙂	1.17% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hardware/view.py	82.79% ⭐	82.98% ⭐	0.19% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/requirement/panel.py	64.10% 🙂	63.30% 🙂	-0.80% 👎
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/requirement/view.py	84.08% ⭐	84.20% ⭐	0.12% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/similar_item/panel.py	81.69% ⭐	81.83% ⭐	0.14% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/similar_item/view.py	83.23% ⭐	83.23% ⭐	0.00%
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/validation/panel.py	71.05% 🙂	71.41% 🙂	0.36% 👍
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/widgets/treeview.py	74.86% 🙂	74.86% 🙂	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/hardware/panel.py	HardwareTreePanel._on_module_switch.HardwareGeneralDataPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	441 ⛔	18 ⛔	39.76% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/validation/panel.py	ValidationTreePanel._on_module_switch.ValidationTaskDescriptionPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	438 ⛔	16 ⛔	41.65% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/validation/panel.py	ValidationTreePanel._on_module_switch.ValidationTaskDescriptionPanel._do_make_task_code.ValidationTaskEffortPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	339 ⛔	15 😞	44.25% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/widgets/treeview.py	CellRendererML.do_start_editing	4 ⭐	292 ⛔	13 😞	44.30% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/ramstk/views/gtk3/requirement/panel.py	RequirementTreePanel._on_module_switch.RequirementGeneralDataPanel.__init__	0 ⭐	361 ⛔	13 😞	46.47% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication