Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Integration: add missing z.tuple().rest() type #1660

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024
Merged

Integration: add missing z.tuple().rest() type #1660

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

RobinTail
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@RobinTail RobinTail added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation refactoring The better way to achieve the same result prevention labels Apr 1, 2024
@RobinTail RobinTail marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2024 12:26
RobinTail
RobinTail commented Apr 1, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner Author

@RobinTail RobinTail left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@RobinTail RobinTail merged commit 2703a28 into master Apr 1, 2024
12 checks passed
@RobinTail RobinTail deleted the int-tuple-rest branch April 1, 2024 12:29
@coveralls-official Coveralls Official
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 100.0%. remained the same
when pulling da9aa3c on int-tuple-rest
into 69a4bc0 on master.

@RobinTail RobinTail restored the int-tuple-rest branch April 1, 2024 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation prevention refactoring The better way to achieve the same result
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@RobinTail