Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

#45: Check file existence when parsing additional doc files #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2023
Merged

#45: Check file existence when parsing additional doc files #81

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2023

Conversation

vitgrams
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@vitgrams vitgrams closed this Mar 29, 2023
@vitgrams vitgrams force-pushed the 45_fix_exception_when_setting_invalid_additional_path branch from 966169b to 1acfdaa Compare March 29, 2023 18:48
@vitgrams vitgrams reopened this Mar 29, 2023
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 29, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 29, 2023

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

@vitgrams vitgrams requested a review from DenTray March 29, 2023 18:50
@vitgrams
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DenTray Done.

@DenTray DenTray merged commit c9efdfb into master Mar 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@DenTray DenTray DenTray approved these changes

Assignees

@DenTray DenTray

Labels
state: code review type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vitgrams @DenTray