Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix method name to convert binary to hex in Serializable module #71

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2013
Merged

Fix method name to convert binary to hex in Serializable module #71

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2013

Conversation

mjio
Copy link
Contributor

@mjio mjio commented Sep 11, 2013

Util.bytes2hex doesn't exits, it's called Util.bin2hex.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.04%) when pulling cbe7fe1 on mjio:fix_serializable_module into ad1cd17 on cryptosphere:master.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Contributor

facepalm

@namelessjon it pains me we don't have test coverage for this 😦 Burned again!

tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2013
Fix method name to convert binary to hex in Serializable module
@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit a49d761 into RubyCrypto:master Sep 11, 2013
@namelessjon
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, much 😦 . Let's get 100% test coverage, and then keep it that way. Though apparently this module is 100% covered. Perhaps some kind of mutation testing?

@snusnu
Copy link

snusnu commented Sep 11, 2013

What about using mutant? I can provide help setting it up if need be. I really think that a cryptographic lib like that would benefit from 100% mutation test coverage, and it's actually not that hard to achieve. I might be able to help out with writing a few specs too.

@namelessjon
Copy link
Contributor

That's what I was considering, yeah.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Contributor

Regardless of what coverage tools are reporting that's clearly not getting exercised by the suite. I'll see if I can put together some shared specs for Serializable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants