-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MC-SAT Thread Safety #456
Merged
ahmed-irfan
merged 2 commits into
SRI-CSL:master
from
markpmitchell:mcsat-thread-safety
Sep 22, 2023
Merged
MC-SAT Thread Safety #456
ahmed-irfan
merged 2 commits into
SRI-CSL:master
from
markpmitchell:mcsat-thread-safety
Sep 22, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ahmed-irfan
reviewed
Sep 22, 2023
if(retcode){ | ||
fprintf(stderr, "create_yices_lock failed: pthread_mutexattr_settype returned %d\n", retcode); | ||
} | ||
#ifndef NDEBUG |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor style thing:
can we #ifdef DEBUG?
No, we cannot — because DEBUG is never defined. :-)
Of course, we could define it somewhere, but NDEBUG is the standard macro used to disable assert. And, most of the Yices code base seems to use “#ifndef NDEBUG” to guard other debug code.
Thank you,
…--
Mark Mitchell
On Sep 22, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Ahmed ***@***.***> wrote:
@ahmed-irfan commented on this pull request.
In src/mt/yices_locks_posix.c <#456 (comment)>:
>
int32_t create_yices_lock(yices_lock_t* lock){
int32_t retcode;
-#ifdef DEBUG
- retcode = pthread_mutexattr_settype(&mta, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK);
- if(retcode){
- fprintf(stderr, "create_yices_lock failed: pthread_mutexattr_settype returned %d\n", retcode);
- }
+#ifndef NDEBUG
minor style thing:
can we #ifdef DEBUG?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#456 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKVS3GHJ7RRD5IWI3CIV4TX3W77NANCNFSM6AAAAAA5CLVCBM>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
I understand. |
ahmed-irfan
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request contains two components (each in its own commit):
With these changes, the test suite passes using --enable-mcsat --enable-thread-safety. Of course, the testsuite doesn't exercise the multi-threaded mode and we have no way to prove that MC-SAT is 100% thread-safe. But, this would seem to be a step forward.