-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes #164 Battle clear edi historical data #188
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good to me. A couple of items to note:
- some NAs for stream that we should double check we are consistent on removing (looks like we remove for trap in standard format but not catch, or I am missing something)
- We may need to open an issue to handle the new site lbc.
- Agree it would be good to follow up on the data quality issues that we see persisting on the EDI package.
mutate(stream = case_when(grepl("clear", site) ~ "clear creek", | ||
grepl("battle", site) ~ "battle creek"), | ||
site = case_when(site == "upper battle creek" ~ "ubc", | ||
site == "lower battle creek" ~ "lbc", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lbc is a new site we didn't have data on that site before. Do we want to create an issue to add that to all our other tables/lookups?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lbc might have to do with a release location but no RST site
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looked into this more and there are fish being caught at lbc and include spring chinook. Most of this data is prior to 2003 which we originally were not provided with. We should double check with Natasha about using this data but should also open an issue to add lbc to tables/lookups
data-raw/standard-format-data-prep/rst_catch_standard_format.Rmd
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good!
This PR pulls data from EDI for Battle and Clear and adds to the standard format scripts. In the pull script (data-raw/qc-markdowns/rst/battle_clear_edi.Rmd) I noted some TODOs. I would focus review on these and let me know what you think. We can discuss as needed.