Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KA performance #69

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2020
Merged

KA performance #69

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2020

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member Author

Is there a good rule of thumb on when we should unroll things like https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqGPU.jl/pull/69/files#diff-90f5ad9f4eb9fd418f70216b94a00be1R51 ?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #69 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #69   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           1       1           
  Lines         238     238           
======================================
  Misses        238     238           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/DiffEqGPU.jl 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 849beb7...1062eb1. Read the comment docs.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 7c4398d into master Jul 29, 2020
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the performance branch July 29, 2020 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant