Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run precompile workload in parallel #418

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

oscardssmith
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not 100% sure this is working as intended (because these precompiles are over-specialized), but it does bring the precompile time down from ~150 seconds to 50 seconds on 4 cores.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.65%. Comparing base (d434b8d) to head (c834033).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #418      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.30%   85.65%   -0.66%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        2914     2921       +7     
==========================================
- Hits         2515     2502      -13     
- Misses        399      419      +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

oscardssmith added a commit to oscardssmith/NonlinearSolve.jl that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Remove Float32 method and the Vector out of place methods since these are less likely to be useful to users. This brings down precompilation time by ~2x. I think this is good to do before SciML#418 since I'm more sure that it's a good idea.
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit db1032c into SciML:master May 3, 2024
11 of 18 checks passed
@oscardssmith oscardssmith deleted the os/parallel-precompile branch May 3, 2024 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants