Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/fix nextra docs name #201

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

emrgnt-cmplxty
Copy link
Contributor

@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty commented Mar 24, 2024

Ellipsis 🚀 This PR description was created by Ellipsis for commit 08aed8c.

Summary:

This PR enhances the documentation of the R2R project, providing detailed explanations and examples for various components, and makes minor modifications to the package.json and _meta.json files, as well as the ingestion.py file.

Key points:

  • Updated package.json to change the description.
  • Modified _meta.json files to rearrange sections.
  • Added detailed documentation for various components in .mdx files.
  • Updated ingestion.py to expect HTML data as bytes.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

@emrgnt-cmplxty emrgnt-cmplxty merged commit 33aefe9 into main Mar 24, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
r2r-docs 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 24, 2024 6:39am

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me!

  • Reviewed the entire pull request up to 08aed8c
  • Looked at 629 lines of code in 9 files
  • Took 55 seconds to review
More info
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.
1. /docs/package.json:4:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The change in the description of the project in the package.json file is appropriate and doesn't introduce any issues.
  • Reasoning:
    The PR author has made changes to the package.json file, specifically changing the description of the project. This is a minor change and doesn't seem to introduce any issues. The PR author has also made changes to the _meta.json files, adding and rearranging some entries. This seems to be part of the documentation restructuring and doesn't introduce any issues. The PR author has added new .mdx files for the documentation of different features. The content of these files seems to be well-written and doesn't introduce any issues. The PR author has made changes to the ingestion.py file, specifically changing the expected type of HTML data from string to bytes. This change seems to be correct and doesn't introduce any issues.
2. /docs/pages/_meta.json:3:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The changes made to the _meta.json files are appropriate and don't introduce any issues.
  • Reasoning:
    The changes made to the _meta.json files are part of the documentation restructuring. The PR author has added and rearranged some entries. These changes are appropriate and don't introduce any issues.
3. /docs/pages/core-features/embedding.mdx:1:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The new .mdx files added for the documentation of different features are well-written and don't introduce any issues.
  • Reasoning:
    The PR author has added new .mdx files for the documentation of different features. The content of these files seems to be well-written and doesn't introduce any issues.
4. /r2r/pipelines/basic/ingestion.py:88:
  • Assessed confidence : 0%
  • Comment:
    The change in the expected type of HTML data from string to bytes in the ingestion.py file is appropriate and doesn't introduce any issues.
  • Reasoning:
    The PR author has made changes to the ingestion.py file, specifically changing the expected type of HTML data from string to bytes. This change seems to be correct and doesn't introduce any issues.

Workflow ID: wflow_OBoho6kQTvU9njWC


Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant