New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raspberry Pi - driver and overlay available for seeed-can-fd-hat #13
Comments
Thank you very much for the PR, we will revise the document as soon as possible, thanks. |
Hey @Pillar1989, just a quick update, we've renamed the overlays, it's now
|
@menschel Thank you for the reminder, it is very much appreciated. |
Thank you but actually, most of the credit goes to @marckleinebudde . |
We all stand on the shoulders of giants. @menschel had the idea to create a single overlay for the board. |
@marckleinebudde You missed one - the mcp2518fd with the rtc. |
Hey @JakeSays, the
Is there a HAT with two mcp2518fd and no RTC? |
This list indicates there may have been a second batch of the first design populated with mcp2518fd instead. https://wiki.seeedstudio.com/2-Channel-CAN-BUS-FD-Shield-for-Raspberry-Pi/#versions-declare And the first design is missing the RTC. |
Hmmm, ok. If they have the old board populated with a mcp2518fd instead (no RTC) and are using spi1-0 as on the mcp2517fd, then just use the Let's wait for Seeed Studio to clarify. |
@marckleinebudde yeah there is unfortunately. I have two. |
Ok, the we have to clarify the readme. |
What about:
|
I believe the battery holder is the "indicator" to distinguish v1 and v2. The first design has spi0-0 and spi1-0 and no battery holder / RTC. The second design has the battery holder / RTC and spi0-0 , spi0-1 combination. So i would drop the (based on .*) entry in favor of a clause to look for the battery holder. I also believe your
is hardware identical to my
|
That all makes sense :) What about:
|
Perfect, don't forget to limit the lines to 80 chars. |
Sure. I was to lazy to copy form here to editor and back here. :) |
rewrapped to 80 chars:
|
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn>
raspberrypi inclusion category: feature bugzilla: 50432 -------------------------------- It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Fang Yafen <yafen@iscas.ac.cn> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
I am trying to get the Seeed CAN HAT (with RTC) working. I used the Image tool and have the following rpi version: but this does not have the dtbo in /boot/overlays which is where I understand they should be. Assuming I can get a dtbo is all I need to do is update /boot/config.txt Thanks |
I did the rpi-update to sudo reboot then followed the tests on Seed. It all worked. Thanks |
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
commit bb45ac9c400f2c11437033f7834a6241f842f9e3 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.10.y It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <Meng.Li@windriver.com>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
It turns out the used CAN SPI chip is not a good way to identify the version of the CAN HAT. There are two different board layouts of the Seeed Studio CAN BUS FD HAT. The v1 board doesn't have a battery holder, while the v2 board has. Update the overlay README accordinly. Link: Seeed-Studio/seeed-linux-dtoverlays#13 Cc: Patrick Menschel <menschel.p@posteo.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Hi,
there is now support for seeed-can-fd-hat in regular raspberry pi kernel.
raspberrypi/linux#4034
Please update your readme.md
and the wiki page.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: