Skip to content

Conversation

eric-lee-ltk
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 85.193% when pulling a896601 on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into ace8b8d on ServiceComb:master.

@seanyinx
Copy link
Member

please rebase master

@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk force-pushed the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch from a896601 to 3bcb2a7 Compare July 18, 2017 07:23
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 85.224% when pulling 3bcb2a7 on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into ace8b8d on ServiceComb:master.

@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk force-pushed the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch from 3bcb2a7 to 67b7fd0 Compare July 18, 2017 08:50
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 85.193% when pulling 67b7fd0 on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into ace8b8d on ServiceComb:master.

@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk force-pushed the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch from 67b7fd0 to 4face79 Compare July 19, 2017 01:21
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 4face79 on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into ** on ServiceComb:master**.

@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk force-pushed the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch from 4face79 to fc01cec Compare July 19, 2017 08:23
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 85.193% when pulling fc01cec on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into 11288ff on ServiceComb:master.

@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk force-pushed the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch from fc01cec to ae8d0c6 Compare July 19, 2017 14:32
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 85.197% when pulling ae8d0c6 on eric-lee-ltk:JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests into 984eea5 on ServiceComb:master.

@seanyinx seanyinx merged commit 29557f3 into apache:master Jul 20, 2017
@eric-lee-ltk eric-lee-ltk deleted the JAV-88_spring_pojo_tests branch July 20, 2017 11:00
@WillemJiang WillemJiang modified the milestone: 0.2.0 Aug 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants