Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

temporary fix for unique constraints #251

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

aarushik93
Copy link
Contributor

@aarushik93 aarushik93 commented Apr 25, 2024

Type

enhancement


Description

  • Introduced a new variable repo to generate a unique UUID for each deployment.
  • Utilized the repo variable to dynamically set the dbName and dbUser fields, ensuring their uniqueness and relevance to the specific deployment.
  • Removed previously hardcoded empty strings for dbName and dbUser, improving data integrity and consistency.
  • Simplified the repo field assignment in the deployment creation process, enhancing code readability and maintainability.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
agent.py
Enhance unique constraint handling in deployment creation

codex/deploy/agent.py

  • Introduced a new variable repo to store a unique UUID.
  • Used the repo variable to set dbName and dbUser fields, ensuring
    uniqueness.
  • Removed hardcoded empty strings for dbName and dbUser.
  • Simplified the assignment of the repo field by using the repo variable
    directly.
  • +4/-6     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 25, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (ff504ad)

    Copy link

    Questions to better understand the PR:

    1. Does the repo variable, now being used to ensure uniqueness, impact any existing data or processes where dbName and dbUser were previously used?
    2. Is the generation of the repo UUID guaranteed to be unique across all possible deployments, and are there any collision considerations?
    3. How does this change improve the maintainability of the code compared to the previous implementation?

    Please respond to the questions above in the following format:

    /answer

    1. ...
    2. ...
      ...

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Apr 25, 2024

    CI Failure Feedback

    (Checks updated until commit 2cbfc57)

    Action: code-quality

    Failed stage: Run ruff formatter [❌]

    Failure summary:

    The action failed due to an undefined variable repo_uuid in the file codex/deploy/agent.py at line
    43, character 81. This indicates that repo_uuid was referenced before it was declared or it is not
    declared at all within the accessible scope.

    Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    453:  pythonLocation: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64
    454:  PKG_CONFIG_PATH: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64/lib/pkgconfig
    455:  Python_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64
    456:  Python2_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64
    457:  Python3_ROOT_DIR: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64
    458:  LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64/lib
    459:  ##[endgroup]
    460:  codex/deploy/agent.py:43:81: F821 Undefined name `repo_uuid`
    461:  Found 1 error.
    462:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ async def create_local_deployment(

    zip_file = await create_zip_file(app, spec)
    file_name = completedApp.name.replace(" ", "_")

    repo = str(uuid.uuid4())

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of repo for the UUID string that represents a repository. A name like repo_id or repo_uuid would make it clearer that the variable holds an identifier, not a repository object. [maintainability]

    Suggested change
    repo = str(uuid.uuid4())
    repo_uuid = str(uuid.uuid4())

    codex/deploy/agent.py Show resolved Hide resolved
    Comment on lines 52 to 53
    dbName=repo+"_db",
    dbUser=repo+"_repo",

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Suggestion: To enhance security and avoid potential conflicts, consider appending a timestamp or additional unique identifiers to the dbName and dbUser along with the UUID. This can help in scenarios where multiple instances are created around the same time. [enhancement]

    Suggested change
    dbName=repo+"_db",
    dbUser=repo+"_repo",
    dbName=f"{repo_uuid}_db_{int(time.time())}",
    dbUser=f"{repo_uuid}_user_{int(time.time())}",

    codex/deploy/agent.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    codex/deploy/agent.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    Copy link

    Changelog updates:

    2024-04-25

    Added

    • Introduced a new variable repo to generate a unique UUID for each deployment.

    Changed

    • Utilized the repo variable to dynamically set the dbName and dbUser fields, ensuring their uniqueness and relevance to the specific deployment.

    Fixed

    • Removed previously hardcoded empty strings for dbName and dbUser, improving data integrity and consistency.

    to commit the new content to the CHANGELOG.md file, please type:
    '/update_changelog --pr_update_changelog.push_changelog_changes=true'

    Copy link

    PR Analysis

    • This screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR.
    • You can initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes.
    • After you check a box, the action will be performed automatically by PR-Agent.
    • Results will appear as a comment on the PR, typically after 30-60 seconds.
    fileChanged components
    agent.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
    • Similar
     
    create_local_deployment
    (function)
     
    +5/-7
     

    ✨ Usage guide:

    Using static code analysis capabilities, the analyze tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR.
    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

    /analyze
    

    Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript.
    See more information about the tool in the docs.

    Copy link
    Member

    @ntindle ntindle left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Some of the logging suggestions are useful

    @Swiftyos
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /review

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Apr 25, 2024

    PR Review

    (Review updated until commit 859e65f)

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are relatively straightforward and localized to a specific functionality, but require careful consideration of the new variable usage and its impact on the system.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Possible Bug: The unique_prefix is generated using the last 6 characters of user_id and completed_app_id. If these IDs are not guaranteed to be at least 6 characters long, this could lead to a runtime error.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Code feedback:
    relevant filecodex/deploy/agent.py
    suggestion      

    Consider adding a check to ensure that user_id and completed_app_id are at least 6 characters long before slicing. This will prevent potential runtime errors if the IDs are shorter than expected. [important]

    relevant linetrunc_user_id = ids.user_id[-6:]

    codex/deploy/agent.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    @ntindle
    Copy link
    Member

    ntindle commented Apr 25, 2024

    the _{zip_file} being used in a string i think is valid issue that could come up

    codex/deploy/agent.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    @aarushik93
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    /review

    Copy link

    Persistent review updated to latest commit 859e65f

    @Swiftyos
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /review auto_approve

    Copy link

    Auto-approved PR

    aarushik93 and others added 3 commits April 25, 2024 16:19
    Co-authored-by: codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] <151058649+codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    @aarushik93 aarushik93 merged commit d32fbef into main Apr 25, 2024
    3 checks passed
    @aarushik93 aarushik93 deleted the fix-local-zip-creation branch April 25, 2024 15:37
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants