Improvement/pattern tools #116
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request aims to improve pattern utilities by extending the parse marks with more functionality:
(:first choice|:second choice)
), the stripped text representation of the ChoiceElement will be the mark. This means that a choice group:first [choice]
won't have 'first [choice]' as parse mark, but 'first' (notice the space at the end is omitted).:(first|second)
) to apply this behaviour to all elements of the group (except for the ones that still have a mark present: these will override this behaviour).getNumericMark()
which will parse all strings as integers (with the correct base) and XOR them accordingly (basically the old behaviour)getSingleMark()
to quickly get a mark.hasMark(String)
to quickly check if a mark is present.This will be very helpful for patterns that require multiple parse marks in different groups. In all other cases, you probably are better of using integer marks.