Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tests.txt #302

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2024
Merged

Update tests.txt #302

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

Smartappli
Copy link
Owner

@Smartappli Smartappli commented Jul 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency version specifications for improved stability and compatibility in testing environments.
    • Restricted torch versions to below 2.4.0 and upgraded syft to >=0.9.0b1.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The recent changes refine the dependency specifications in the tests.txt file. The version constraint for torch is now set to ensure compatibility with earlier versions, while the syft dependency has been upgraded to a newer beta version. These adjustments aim to enhance the stability and functionality of the testing environment, promoting smoother operation and integration of components.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests.txt - Updated torch version from >=2.2.2 to >=2.2.2,<2.4.0 to restrict to earlier versions.
- Updated syft version from >=0.8.7b10 to >=0.9.0b1, advancing to a newer beta release.

Poem

🐇 In the garden where changes bloom,
Dependencies dance, dispelling gloom.
Torch shines bright, yet stays in line,
Syft leaps forward, oh how divine!
With every update, we take new flight,
Hopping to success, gleeful and bright! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Smartappli Smartappli merged commit a354192 into master Jul 26, 2024
17 of 24 checks passed
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 6a6e2f71
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6a6e2f7) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (d06e4b9) 2127 1737 81.66%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#302) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant