Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Post to Hackage and/or Merge with Groundhog? #4

Open
pjones opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Post to Hackage and/or Merge with Groundhog? #4

pjones opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@pjones
Copy link

pjones commented Oct 30, 2017

Are there any plans to upload this package to Hackage? What about merging some of the generic functions back into Groundhog (e.g., the key conversion functions)?

@MichaelXavier
Copy link
Contributor

@ozataman any opinion? My first thought is that this could be on hackage as a separate package. It seems inappropriate for some of this library like the safecopy conversions to be in groundhog proper as it would incur a safecopy dependency. You could probably argue that the key/integral conversion functions may have a place in groundhog proper and I could speculatively open an issue to see if the author would be open to that. If that happened, we could CPP in this library to just re-export from the main library beyond a certain version number.

@pjones
Copy link
Author

pjones commented Nov 15, 2017

@lykahb How do you feel about the key conversion functions in this package? I also think the Entity type and selectEntity function are very useful. It would be really nice to have these in Groundhog proper.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants