Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the chat #549

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fixing the chat #549

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kolor4do
Copy link
Contributor

Many complained about ChatBubble as it revealed where the players were so I think it would be better to remove it.

Many complained about ChatBubble as it revealed where the players were so I think it would be better to remove it.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 13, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/southclaws/scavenge-survive/G7T6NaLeuxhTQtXH4ED5m3xpbCTs
✅ Preview: https://scavenge-survive-git-fork-nicolasmenegoni-patch-10-southclaws.vercel.app

@Southclaws
Copy link
Owner

If you spoke to someone in real life, others nearby would hear you so this simulates that effect.

I think a better solution would be a whisper mechanic that would have a ~2m radius so it was intended for people stood right next to you.

Most of the mechanics in SS aim to simulate something but also behave as a way of balancing things and forcing players to think about their actions. Speaking and sharing information should come with a risk, and that risk is revealing information to nearby listeners whom you may not know are hiding.

However, the change for the checks in the foreach loop are good, it would be great to land those in another PR.

@kolor4do
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, it makes sense.

@kolor4do kolor4do closed this May 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants