Updates modules for Standard changes in Spezi 0.7.0

[vishnuravi]

Updates module for Standard changes in Spezi 0.7.0

♻️ Current situation & Problem

Spezi 0.7.0 changes how Standards are defined and has made using a Standard in a module optional. The SpeziStorage module previously required defining a Standard even though it does not use one.

💡 Proposed solution

Updates SpeziStorage to remove the Standard requirement, which makes it simpler to use.

Testing

Tests have been updated.

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[vishnuravi]

@PSchmiedmayer the swiftlint error here in Tests/UITests/TestApp/TestApp.swift appears to be a false positive? I have not edited this file. (See related issue: realm/SwiftLint#4843)

[Supereg]

@PSchmiedmayer the swiftlint error here in Tests/UITests/TestApp/TestApp.swift appears to be a false positive? I have not edited this file. (See related issue: realm/SwiftLint#4843)

If I may provide input on this.
You are seeing this issue due to an upgraded swiftlint version introduced with the new swiftlint GitHub action.
We kinda came to the conclusion to just remove the attributes rule from the swiftlint config for now. At least that was what we were doing in most of the other projects. Maybe it’s worth creating a GitHub issue over at the ’.github’ project as we could discuss reintroducing the rule with a more customized configuration?

[vishnuravi]

@PSchmiedmayer the swiftlint error here in Tests/UITests/TestApp/TestApp.swift appears to be a false positive? I have not edited this file. (See related issue: realm/SwiftLint#4843)

If I may provide input on this. You are seeing this issue due to an upgraded swiftlint version introduced with the new swiftlint GitHub action. We kinda came to the conclusion to just remove the attributes rule from the swiftlint config for now. At least that was what we were doing in most of the other projects. Maybe it’s worth creating a GitHub issue over at the ’.github’ project as we could discuss reintroducing the rule with a more customized configuration?

Hi @Supereg thank you, that makes sense. I fixed this for the time being by setting attributes_with_arguments_always_on_line_above to false as described here: realm/SwiftLint#4855.

[PSchmiedmayer]

@vishnuravi Thank you for the PR, that is very helpful! @niallkehoe that might also help you in taking a look at the Scheduler Module and the HPDS and PRISM apps 👍

Thank you @Supereg on the input!
@vishnuravi I like the approach of using attributes_with_arguments_always_on_line_above, that looks like a clean solution here.

[vishnuravi]

The UI tests are passing locally, but are stuck on "Running..." on the UI test action. Will debug.

[PSchmiedmayer]

@vishnuravi I took a closer look at our build agents and fixed a few things. It should build now and should be ready to merge the PR 👍

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8 (15780c0) into main (5dc128a) will increase coverage by 68.25%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #8       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   23.63%   91.87%   +68.25%     
===========================================
  Files           5        5               
  Lines         381      381               
===========================================
+ Hits           90      350      +260     
+ Misses        291       31      -260     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
Sources/SpeziLocalStorage/LocalStorage.swift	89.43% <ø> (+21.16%)	⬆️
Sources/SpeziSecureStorage/SecureStorage.swift	94.89% <ø> (+94.32%)	⬆️
...ources/SpeziLocalStorage/LocalStorageSetting.swift	97.30% <100.00%> (+48.65%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5dc128a...15780c0. Read the comment docs.

[vishnuravi]

@vishnuravi I took a closer look at our build agents and fixed a few things. It should build now and should be ready to merge the PR 👍

Thanks @PSchmiedmayer, glad the tests are passing now, will merge!