This module computes code coverage for a Julia program at a more fine-grained level than the built-in coverage feature. Specifically, it provides coverage counts for each branch of the ||, && and ?: operators where they occur. It also counts the number of invocations to statement-functions.
Install the software in some directory and then include it at the REPL level (outermost level, either in the interpreter or in a file included by the interpreter not inside a module):
include("microcoverage.jl")
In order to refer to the functions in the module without prefixing them with the module name, use the following declaration:
using microcoverage
Next, instruct the module to instrument your source code:
begintrack("mysourcecode.jl") begintrack("myothersourcecode.jl")
Now run your code as you normally would. Suppose, for example, that
including
mytestruns.jl
invokes many routines whose source code sits inside
mysourcecode.jl
and myothersourcecode.jl
, so you generate
these invocations:
include("mytestruns.jl")
Finally, generate the reports:
endtrack("mysourcecode.jl") endtrack("myothersourcecode.jl")
The microcoverage module works at the source-code level (as opposed
to the standard library coverage feature, which operates close to the machine).
The begintrack
function copies your source code to a backup file
(in the above example, the backup files would be called mysourcecode.jl.orig
and myothersourcecode.jl.orig
). Then it generates a new source
code file (in the above case, named mysourcecode.jl
and
myothersourcecode.jl
) that is peppered with calls to a routine to increment counters.
The method used to generate the new source file is as follows. First, the
entire file is passed through the parse
function. Then the
expressions generated by the parse
function are fathomed by
a routine that inserts a call to increment a counter each time
a new source line is encountered and each time one of the aforementioned
operators is encountered.
This rewritten source code consists of opaque eval
statements and is
not meant to be human-readable.
The endtrack
function restores your original file and generates the
report, which shows the source code line and the corresponding counter.
The reports have the extension mcov
appended; in the above example,
the reports would be named mysourcecode.jl.mcov
and
myothersourcecode.jl.mcov
.
Here are some examples of lines from the .mcov file and what they mean:
* function cmp3(o::Ordering, * treenode::TreeNode, * k, * isleaf::Bool) L167 70360 ? ( 1640 ) : ( 68720 ( 68720 ( 68720 ) && ( 34623 )) || ( 68688 ) ? ( 716 ) : ( 68004 )) * (lt(o, k, treenode.splitkey1))? 1 : * (((isleaf && treenode.child3 == 2) || * lt(o, k, treenode.splitkey2))? 2 : 3) * end
All of these lines are copies of source lines (source lines are
preceded with an asterisk) except for the line marked L167
. This
line is interpreted as follows: L167
means source line number 167.
The line was executed 70360 times. The line has a ?: operator. The
first branch of the operator was executed 1640 times while the second
was executed 68720 times. Meanwhile, the second branch involves an ||
operator; the first argument of this || operator was executed 68720
times while the second was executed 68688 times. These branches have
further nested calling inside of them.
For statement functions, the coverage routine tells how many times they were invoked:
L195 10 ( 10 ) && ( 6 )(called 10 time(s)) * eq(o::Ordering, a, b) = !lt(o, a, b) && !lt(o, b, a)
This statement function was invoked 10 times. It has an internal branch; the first branch was invoked 10 times, while the second was invoked 6 times.
The microcoverage module uses several undocumented aspects of the
Expr
type and theparse
function. These aspects were discovered via trial and error. This means that they may change in a future version of Julia, so the module is rather fragile.The module must be loaded at the REPL level, not inside any other module. The reason is that the invocations to the counter-incrementing routine that are scattered through the instrumented code are of the following form:
Main.microcoverage.incrtrackarray(nn)
. Therefore, if the microcoverage module is nested inside of some other module, then theincrtrackarray
function won't be found.The package does not work if the instrumented code is run in a forked process. This is because the global variable associated with the
incrtrackarray
routine will not be known to the other process. In particular, this means that the microcoverage module does not work if the instrumented code is run via Julia's package-testing mechanism:Pkg.test("mymodule").
Instead, it is necessary to run the test within the same process using a statement like this:include(joinpath(Pkg.dir("mymodule"), "test", "runtests.jl"))
Once a
begintrack
instruction is executed, the microcoverage module should not be reloaded until after the corresponding call toendtrack
because the global variables keeping track of the instrumented code are lost during the reloading process. If it is necessary to reload microcoverage after abegintrack
instruction, then the source code should be restored using therestore
function provided in the module, as in the following snippet:include("microcoverage.jl") using microcoverage begintrack("mysourcecode.jl") include("microcoverage.jl") # oops, global variables reset # knowledge of mysourcecode lost! using microcoverage restore("mysourcecode.jl") # restore the original version begintrack("mysourcecode.jl") # should be good to go now