Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] trying BCEL as the bytecode parser #133

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2018
Merged

Conversation

eklavya
Copy link
Contributor

@eklavya eklavya commented Jun 25, 2018

Here is an attempt to use Apache BCEL as the jvm bytecode parser.

I need all the help here. Any help in advancing this faster is much appreciated.

Apologies in advance for any nonsense in the code :)

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 26, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #133 into master will decrease coverage by 0.58%.
The diff coverage is 58.23%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #133      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     46.86%   46.27%   -0.59%     
+ Complexity      912      891      -21     
============================================
  Files            60       60              
  Lines          9837     9865      +28     
  Branches       1607     1607              
============================================
- Hits           4610     4565      -45     
- Misses         4762     4838      +76     
+ Partials        465      462       -3

@freemo
Copy link
Member

freemo commented Jun 28, 2018

@eklavya approved, good for me to merge?

@freemo freemo merged commit ef17523 into Syncleus:master Jun 28, 2018
@eklavya
Copy link
Contributor Author

eklavya commented Apr 15, 2020

Maybe BCEL could be shaded to not interfere with the user setup.

@grfrost
Copy link
Contributor

grfrost commented Apr 15, 2020

Yeah we could use 'jarjar' or something to change the package name, and then include it in aparapi.jar
https://github.com/google/jarjar

@freemo
Copy link
Member

freemo commented Apr 15, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants