You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This problem is only present in the current unstable version of TPRF.
The current functions gw_sigma and g0w_sigma only consider density-density type interactions in the calculation of Sigma and neglect all other terms. It would be good if the user would be either be warned if some matrix elements of the interaction are neglected or if those are all considered.
I believe the function gw_sigma neglects those terms in the static components, but correctly considers them in the dynamic part, whereas the real frequency version using the spectral representation g0w_sigma neglects them completely.
possible solution
Warn the user if his Coulomb interaction contains non density-density type terms and those would be neglected.
Add the possibility to also consider non den-den terms in both functions. Most importantly in the Matsubara version.
If this is performance critical we can add a switch to sum over those elements or neglect them?
Let me know what you think.
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
This problem is only present in the current unstable version of TPRF.
The current functions
gw_sigma
andg0w_sigma
only consider density-density type interactions in the calculation of Sigma and neglect all other terms. It would be good if the user would be either be warned if some matrix elements of the interaction are neglected or if those are all considered.I believe the function
gw_sigma
neglects those terms in the static components, but correctly considers them in the dynamic part, whereas the real frequency version using the spectral representationg0w_sigma
neglects them completely.possible solution
Let me know what you think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: