RST Rendering
#1263
Replies: 2 comments 9 replies
-
I don't have any plans for RST support, but it would be nice to have. Probably as an external package, i.e. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
So for future visitors of this discussion, I've made a library called |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It would be really cool if Rich supported RST in the same way that it supports Markdown. I have a defopt CLI that I currently document using plain-text docstrings; however, it would be really cool if I could instead use RST to document my CLI and rely on Rich to correctly render it. Just like Markdown support, RST support wouldn't need to be complete; I think focusing on the low hanging fruit (e.g., code-block, headers, italics, bold, lists) would satisfy most common use-cases. What do you think? Would love to help working on it if you see value in the idea.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions