You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discussion with voicecoil company raised the prospect of this again:
We can expect the closed-loop bandwidth of the system to be >200hz. A 20hz sawtooth will, of course, have rounded corners, just because mass has inertia (1st Law). (A 10hz wave would waste about 1/2 as much time is the corners.) In this case, the 10th harmonic component of the sawtooth (200hz) will be attenuated by about 1/2, and higher harmonics attenuated proportionately more. For a 20hz 90% sawtooth you could probably expect to get a linear region of about: 50-5-5 = 40ms, so effectively about 80%. (Here I’ve estimated that the corner-rounding could be about 5ms, depending on how much ripple you can tolerate, which wastes the same amount of time as the 10% back-scan.) Note that a 90% sawtooth has about 5X greater amplitude in its corners frequencies than a triangle wave (50% sawtooth) with the same fundamental frequency. That means, if you can use a triangle and acquire your optical information on both slopes, you will have a much higher percentage of linear regions with a triangle compared to a sawtooth. Compared to the linear-region estimate above, the triangle might be: 50-0-2 = 48ms or 96%.
We have quite a few models of Orca cameras. Not all of them support the bidirectional readout light-sheet mode.
Triangle based scan instead of sawtooth.
Should also get a solid number on the bandwidth of our scan capabilities for both waveforms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: