Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mults on bandmap with custom rules #235

Closed
m5evt opened this issue Jan 30, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #386
Closed

Mults on bandmap with custom rules #235

m5evt opened this issue Jan 30, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #386

Comments

@m5evt
Copy link

m5evt commented Jan 30, 2021

I am using these rules:

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tlf-devel/2016-01/txtVP8nDiH35g.txt

for cqww 160. The bandmap doesn't mark mults and so I can't filter "only mults" on the bandmap. Is there anything I can change in the rules file to get this to work? I am using the release tagged as tlf-1.4.1

@dl1jbe
Copy link
Member

dl1jbe commented Jan 30, 2021

Sorry, at the moment "only mults" works only for hardcoded CQWW contest. You could change the CONTEST=cqww160 definition in your rules file, but that will loose the custom point scoring.

@m5evt
Copy link
Author

m5evt commented Feb 2, 2021

Thanks, I had a quick look at the source code to try and hack the function bm_ismulti() in bandmap.c but it didn't work, so I took your suggestion of changing the rules to cqww.

I have a vague memory that this worked as expected for wpx.

For a low power S&P assisted contester this feature working for all mults would be great. I spend a lot of time moving between ctrl+g and alt+g.

@dl1jbe
Copy link
Member

dl1jbe commented Feb 2, 2021

bm_ismulti() is a long standing project which needs to be extended in next time.
We did a first step with the cqww multis some time ago, but did not fount time to make it useful for other contests. Sorry.

@m5evt
Copy link
Author

m5evt commented Feb 5, 2021

Thanks for the reply. No need to say sorry, I completely understand the problem with finding time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants