Skip to content

Conversation

seocam
Copy link
Contributor

@seocam seocam commented Sep 2, 2015

Signed-off-by: Sergio Oliveira sergio@tracy.com.br
Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com

@seocam
Copy link
Contributor Author

seocam commented Sep 2, 2015

We have to test (and stress test) this change before merging.

Signed-off-by: Sergio Oliveira <sergio@tracy.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergio Oliveira <sergio@tracy.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Sergio Oliveira <sergio@tracy.com.br>
@seocam
Copy link
Contributor Author

seocam commented Sep 7, 2015

Implemented test.
Regarding stress test I've done a 12h test with 30 concurrent connections and there was no increase of memory.

Comparing results with master there was a gain of 4 to 7% of performance. I believe we are good to merge.

seocam added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2015
@seocam seocam merged commit 2c57b53 into master Sep 7, 2015
@seocam seocam deleted the fix-pools branch September 7, 2015 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant