Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix linter errors #394

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

chore: fix linter errors #394

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

andretchen0
Copy link
Contributor

@andretchen0 andretchen0 commented May 2, 2024

Problem

Cientos' main is failing the CI linter step.

The <PositionalAudio /> component got committed to main. It has linter errors according to the recently updated eslint rules.

Since the linter errors have been merged into main, branches based on main also can't pass the local linter and fail the CI linter.

Solution

Fixed the linter errors in <PositionalAudio />.

Context

@damienmontastier , first: no worries. I imagine this is just a case of PR making it into main around the time the linter rules were updated.

Second: I've verified that the component works to the best of my knowledge, but please have a look. The linter was unable to automatically fix a number of reported errors, so I had to make a number of changes by hand.

Third: feel free to ignore here and open a fresh PR with your fixes.

I usually don't like to edit others' components, but since this is blocking all other PRs, I wanted to speed up an eventual fix.

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented May 2, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@damienmontastier
Copy link
Contributor

@andretchen0 Yes, the lint had changed and my code was no longer correct. Sorry about that! Everything seems OK with your changes. 👌

@andretchen0 andretchen0 merged commit aa6b479 into main May 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@andretchen0 andretchen0 deleted the chore/lint branch May 2, 2024 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants