-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SRT2D repository: SRT 2D PET and SPECT algorithms #1420
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Changes to use initial SSRB and arc-correction
…rom file - symmetry used" This reverts commit b32bb29.
Corrected the 2 mistakes in the Codacy report
Correction of the 8 (potentially minor) mistakes of the Codacy report
…hs [ci skip] typo in file name
…e_PET_data_for_tests.sh [ci skip] Applied Codacy static requested changes Also changed the file's name to the original, because it created a conflict which prevented Appveyor from running
Applied changed requested from Codacy static
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans, THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY! |
Checking if this change can lead to running Build and ctest and recon_test_pack CI
Checking if this change will run the Build and ctest and recon_test_pack CI tests
Reverting the last change to the original file, as the change did not lead to the running of Build and ctest and recon_test_pack CI tests
There is no chage in the file. As only Codacy and not CI test runs after changes in build-test.yml, I had to make a space change here for Appveyor to run for my pull-request after my last build-test.yml change
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans, THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY!!! |
I had forgoten the last line: 'fi'
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans, Also I have the impression that maybe this file could be renamed to 'simulate_PET_and_SPECT_data_for_tests.sh'; I could not rename it because this led to a problem in merging. THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
I changed a whitespace, so that Appveyor would run
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans, THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
corrected name of file, so that it does not include the term 'SPECT' twice
Dear Professor, Locally on my pc the tests run; I attach the screenshots. Also the reconstructed image is ok. I) The Build CI error is that forward_project fails. Could you maybe access the my_create_sino_SPECT.log file that was created, in case it has extra info than my .log file? II) Locally on my pc my_create_sino_SPECT.log, which I attach contains 5 warnings, which I can't imagine causing this fail.
III) For run_test_simulate_and_reckon.sh to run the emission and attenuation data cannot be altered; only _the SPECT scanner parameters can be altered, and of course the forward_project.par file. I am really sorry for all the trouble. I am looking forward to your reply. THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR YOUR PATIENCE, AND ALL YOUR TRULY INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans , Locally in my reckon_test_pack I had both SPECT_test_Interfile_header.hs and SPECT_Interfile_header.hs (because I wanted to have a backup in case of changes), hence I apparently copied the content of the 2nd, while having given the name of the 1st... I now corrected the mistake, and Appveyor and Codacy run again. I am really sorry. I hope this is the last mistake... THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR YOUR PATIENCE, AND FOR ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans , I need to change a typo I noticed in the error message for SPECT sinogram. I wonder whether the file simulate_PET_data_for_tests.sh might be changed to THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR YOUR PATIENCE, AND ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans , THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR YOUR PATIENCE, AND ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
correction of typo in error message
removed terminal message
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans , THANK YOU WHOLEHEARTEDLY FOR YOUR PATIENCE, AND ALL YOUR INVALUABLE HELP!!! |
Thanks @Dimitra-Kyriakopoulou, success! I will provide a review later, but probably only second half of August due to commitments. In any case, we know this is good to go now! |
Dear Professor @KrisThielemans , |
Changes in this pull request
2 new analytic reconstruction algorithms SRT 2D PET in the src→ analytic → SRT2D folder and SRT 2D SPECT in the src→ analytic → SRT2DSPECT folder of my SRT2D repository.
[In 2016 in SRT2D folder had been uploaded the prior versions of both these two codes: these old versions do not work with the current STIR version (as there had been pointer etc changes in STIR in between). Also the new versions of the 2 algorithms are improved, e.g. the old SRT2DSPECT run only for uniform data, whereas the new one doesn’t have such restriction.]
Testing performed
Related issues
Checklist before requesting a review
documentation/release_XXX.md
has been updated with any functionality change (if applicable)