-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First edit: header background image #52
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ footer-link-col: "#404040" | |||
# Alternatively, the navbar, footer, and page background can be set to use background images | |||
# instead of colour | |||
|
|||
# navbar-img: "/img/bgimage.png" | |||
navbar-img: "../img/rse-transport-light.png" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we use the same background image in the footer, for consistency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or at least, the same color changes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn’t give it much thought! Let me try it out quickly and see. Do you think a bold footer that sandwiches the page is better than a subtle one that doesn’t distract from the header and content?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thought was that headers and footers tend to be symmetric, to sandwich the page as you say.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They can be, you can see everything from an off gray to black, to the exact same image. Here it is, as it is now (keeping a gray):
and here it is if we set the same image:
of course we'd need to fix the text color!
I actually like the dark, but having the double purple is a bit much for color (it's generally good to be selective about colors). We could also mirror something that the UK rse site did? Here is their footer:
So here is an example with ours:
I personally am of the mindset of having simplicity, and being careful about the choice of bright and dark colors. In that the footer was thin, I think I'd go for a dark (non purple) one like above. But it's fairly large, so instead it would draw attention away from what's above it. I'd definitely like to hear others' opinions too - I'm partial to the light colors, but could see the black with purple line being a reasonable option. I don't like the double purple - it's just too much purple.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know if you want to see anything else!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually like either of the two border options! I think the border gives a nice continuity without being so starkly contrasting with the white. But I'm good with majority rules on all these design options too...
@cosden could you describe the accessibility issues you are worried about?
I was worried about the white on maroon in the header. I put in #FFFFFF and #500e3d in https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ and it passed all the tests they have there. So as far as I can tell, it's fine!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
Did we want the small border (5px, shown here) or the large (20px, shown further back)? I lean toward the larger one, since it establishes a bit more symmetry between the header and the footer; but I could go either way. |
Either 15px or 20px looks good to me. |
The 15px (weirdly) looks better here, but in the actual browser I prefer the smaller one. I would have gone with no border at all, so now I'm compromising to be a smaller purple. Thoughts? |
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
@cferenba done! 15px. |
This looks great! Seems to me like a good compromise - it gives some symmetry between the header and footer without an overwhelming amount of color in the footer. Unless @cosden or anyone else has major objections, I think we're good to go. |
I know @cosden already said he liked it, plus one other in Slack, and I'll add in my vote! Merging. |
Beautiful! https://us-rse.org/ Let me know what you'd like to work on / test next. |
Here is the first of several PRs (that we can move through one by one) to customize the header. Specifically, we add a subtly textured background image to give the site a little more oopmh, and (start to) make it look less identifyable as a Beautiful Jekyll theme.
A quick snapshot:
The logo would look much improved with transparency and possibly removing the text, but I do not have a version with full stripes across the top (I am not able to create a professional version with my software) so instead I left as is.
Note that the only changes here are adding a background image, and adjusting the header colors so it's readable.
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat vsochat@stanford.edu