Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Establish a baseline for the number of envs disabled per project (#6807) #6819

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

thomasheartman
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a counter in Prometheus for counting the number of
"environment disabled" events we get per project. The purpose of this is
to establish a baseline for one of the "project management UI" project's
key results.

On gauges vs counters

This PR uses a counter. Using a gauge would give you the total number of
envs disabled, not the number of disable events. The difference is
subtle, but important.

For projects that were created before the new feature, the gauge might
be appropriate. Because each disabled env would require at least one
disabled event, we can get a floor of how many events were triggered for
each project.

However, for projects created after we introduce the planned change,
we're not interested in the total envs anymore, because you can disable
a hundred envs on creation with a single action. In this case, a gauge
showing 100 disabled envs would be misleading, because it didn't take
100 events to disable them.

So the interesting metric here is how many times did you specifically
disable an environment in project settings, hence the counter.

Assumptions and future plans

To make this easier on ourselves, we make the follow assumption: people
primarily disable envs when creating a project.

This means that there might be a few lagging indicators granting some
projects a smaller number of events than expected, but we may be able to
filter those out.

Further, if we had a metric for each project and its creation date, we
could correlate that with the metrics to answer the question "how many
envs do people disable in the first week? Two weeks? A month?". Or
worded differently: after creating a project, how long does it take for
people to configure environments?

Similarly, if we gather that data, it will also make filtering out the
number of events for projects created after the new changes have
been released much easier.

The good news: Because the project creation metric with dates is a
static aggregate, it can be applied at any time, even retroactively, to
see the effects.

…ct (#6807)

This PR adds a counter in Prometheus for counting the number of
"environment disabled" events we get per project. The purpose of this is
to establish a baseline for one of the "project management UI" project's
key results.

## On gauges vs counters

This PR uses a counter. Using a gauge would give you the total number of
envs disabled, not the number of disable events. The difference is
subtle, but important.

For projects that were created before the new feature, the gauge might
be appropriate. Because each disabled env would require at least one
disabled event, we can get a floor of how many events were triggered for
each project.

However, for projects created after we introduce the planned change,
we're not interested in the total envs anymore, because you can disable
a hundred envs on creation with a single action. In this case, a gauge
showing 100 disabled envs would be misleading, because it didn't take
100 events to disable them.

So the interesting metric here is how many times did you specifically
disable an environment in project settings, hence the counter.

## Assumptions and future plans

To make this easier on ourselves, we make the follow assumption: people
primarily disable envs **when creating a project**.

This means that there might be a few lagging indicators granting some
projects a smaller number of events than expected, but we may be able to
filter those out.

Further, if we had a metric for each project and its creation date, we
could correlate that with the metrics to answer the question "how many
envs do people disable in the first week? Two weeks? A month?". Or
worded differently: after creating a project, how long does it take for
people to configure environments?

Similarly, if we gather that data, it will also make filtering out the
number of events for projects created **after** the new changes have
been released much easier.

The good news: Because the project creation metric with dates is a
static aggregate, it can be applied at any time, even retroactively, to
see the effects.
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-monorepo-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 10, 2024 10:49am
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 10, 2024 10:49am

Copy link

@codescene-delta-analysis codescene-delta-analysis bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Health Quality Gates: FAILED

  • Declining Code Health: 1 findings(s) 🚩

View detailed results in CodeScene

Comment on lines +262 to +267
const projectEnvironmentsDisabled = createCounter({
name: 'project_environments_disabled',
help: 'How many "environment disabled" events we have received for each project',
labelNames: ['project_id'],
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Getting worse: Complex Method
MetricsMonitor.startMonitoring already has high cyclomatic complexity, and now it increases in Lines of Code from 522 to 530

Suppress

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All changes in this file are only because the "yarn lint" stage in CI fails without it. It's not actually related to the PR changes I want to merge.

Copy link

@codescene-delta-analysis codescene-delta-analysis bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Health Quality Gates: FAILED

  • Declining Code Health: 1 findings(s) 🚩

View detailed results in CodeScene

@thomasheartman thomasheartman merged commit 02951d2 into 5.11 Apr 10, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@thomasheartman thomasheartman deleted the chore/5.11.2-metrics-collection branch April 10, 2024 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants