You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running multiple web pods wouldn't work because specific ones would know about specific builds/runs.
Changing VM states to not trigger multiple builds might be good but still cause issues. Plus container restart would have all reproservers watching all running pods.
I think the best option is probably to keep one reproserver per cluster, and just run multiple clusters. This is also an opportunity for federation, e.g. there could be "nyu reproserver" and "umass reproserver" and links would point to one specific server and everything would work. It could also be used to have institutional instances providing better quotas to their own employees.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
remram44
added
A-pr-exists
Attention: This issue has an associated pull request already, that should be completed & reviewed
T-task
Type: Something to be done, neither a bugfix nor an enhancement of the code
labels
Apr 15, 2021
Have you considered building ReproServer on top of Binder? I guess you're much more flexible now in what infrastructure you can provide, but the federation aspect would come with the BinderHubs.
Originally opened 2019-11-14 22:36 EST by @remram44
Not a problem for now, but worth thinking about.
Running multiple
web
pods wouldn't work because specific ones would know about specific builds/runs.Changing VM states to not trigger multiple builds might be good but still cause issues. Plus container restart would have all reproservers watching all running pods.
I think the best option is probably to keep one reproserver per cluster, and just run multiple clusters. This is also an opportunity for federation, e.g. there could be "nyu reproserver" and "umass reproserver" and links would point to one specific server and everything would work. It could also be used to have institutional instances providing better quotas to their own employees.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: