-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Internal power is super large #157
Comments
Yes Are you running in analytical mode? |
Yes. I would like to get a reliable power simulation based on the .saif file. Is there any other method to get the accurate power consumption with the generated sram model? |
This capability doesn't exist. We use an analytical model based on simple
switching assumptions much like CACTI.
…On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:36 PM Jian PENG ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes
Are you running in analytical mode?
Yes. I would like to get a reliable power simulation based on the .saif
file. Is there any other method to get the accurate power consumption with
the generated sram model?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#157 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC67SLYQA6WJCPY3X5SLFUTV6AHEVANCNFSM6AAAAAAQLBEAQY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Matthew Guthaus
Associate Dean of Graduate Studies
Professor, Computer Science & Engineering
Baskin School of Engineering
University of California Santa Cruz
https://www.soe.ucsc.edu/people/mrg
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
I use sky130 to generate the SRAM. But in the .lib file, the internal power is super large which is impossible in the real world. This super large internal power result is also reported in the DC. Is this a bug?
internal_power(){
when : "!csb0 & web0";
rise_power(scalar){
values("1.706915e+11");
}
fall_power(scalar){
values("1.706915e+11");
}
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: