-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
160Mhz channels are detected as 80Mhz only #301
Comments
@tsg2k2 Please provide screenshot from the application: access points screen with full details per access point |
Here it is
…On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 4:30 PM VREM Software Development < ***@***.***> wrote:
@tsg2k2 <https://github.com/tsg2k2> Please provide screenshot from the
application: access points screen with full details per access point
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#301 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ4IXSPWXMGJG7YRMBVIVB3R3YGWFANCNFSM4OZ5SBIA>
.
|
@tsg2k2 ??? |
In my previous email i have attached a screenshot of 160mhz channel (SSID
tsg51) which is shown as 80mhz only, as per your request.
…On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 5:12 PM VREM Software Development < ***@***.***> wrote:
@tsg2k2 <https://github.com/tsg2k2> ???
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#301 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ4IXSM3NOF6TGJSH5UI473R3YLUPANCNFSM4OZ5SBIA>
.
|
There are no attached screenshot in your previous comments/emails |
Attempt #2
…On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 9:05 AM VREM Software Development < ***@***.***> wrote:
There are no attached screenshot in your previous comments/emails
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#301 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ4IXSNTFHALT65P4UDEFRTR333JTANCNFSM4OZ5SBIA>
.
|
Still no attached screenshot |
Application is relying on the Access Point information provided by Android API. Based on the information you have provided, there are two possibilities:
Please connect to your router and check what is displayed as connection information in the router when android device is connected (80Mhz or 160Mhz width). This would help to determine whether it is an Android API or Android device issue |
The phone doesn't support 160mhz, it connects to this router at 2x2@80mhz
(866mbit phy rate).
I was under assumption that channel width is advertised by AP and this info
is available for device irregardless of it's ability to utilize full
width.
Seems like it's happening via beacon packets
https://www.engeniustech.com/wi-fi-beacon-frames-simplified/
This leaves only one possibility, it seems...
…On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 9:24 AM VREM Software Development < ***@***.***> wrote:
Application is relying on the Access Point information provided by Android
API.
https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/net/wifi/ScanResult
Based on the information you have provided, there are two possibilities:
- Android API returns incorrect channel width
- Android Device does not support 160Mhz width
Please connect to your router and check what is displayed as connection
information in the router when android device is connected (80Mhz or 160Mhz
width). This would help to determine whether it is an Android API or
Android device issue
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#301 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ4IXSNW3DIHS2VLBW2P5BDR4GPALANCNFSM4OZ5SBIA>
.
|
Describe the bug
UI displays 160Mhz channel as 80Mhz, both in the AP list and on the graph.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
160Mhz width should be displayed (and properly reflected on the channel graph too)
Versions
Android 10 on OnePlus7 Pro 5G
WifiAnalizer 2.1.2 - 52GS(10-29)
Additional context
router's own status:
Intel AX200 (2x2 160Mhz wifi 6 card)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: