Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Improve Code Quality and Documentation #91

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 27, 2024

Conversation

AlrzAmini
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request includes several improvements to the codebase aimed at enhancing readability, maintainability, and overall code quality:

  1. Corrected Spelling Mistakes: Fixed various spelling errors throughout the codebase to improve readability and professionalism.

  2. Improved Documentation: Updated and corrected various inaccuracies in the comments and documentation. This will make it easier for other developers to understand the code and contribute to the project.

  3. Null Checks: Remove unnecessary null checks.

  4. Optimized Enumerations: Refactored methods that were enumerating collections multiple times. The collections are now enumerated once and the results are stored, improving the efficiency of these methods.

These changes do not affect the functionality of the code but make it more consistent, efficient, and easier to understand. Your review and feedback are appreciated.

updates the documentation for the `SerializeToXml` method in our codebase. The changes are as follows:

- Added a description for the `input` parameter: "Serializes the input value into an XML format."
- The `namespaces` parameter has been renamed to `ns`.
2.Update null check for .NET 6 compatibility

updates the null check in the IsValidPersianDate method to be compatible with .NET 6, where strings are non-nullable by default. The method now checks if the persianDate is null or whitespace, which is more robust and prevents potential errors when the input is an empty string or contains only whitespace.
This commit refactors the null check in the HasContentType and GetContentTypeValue methods. The null check in HasContentType method has been removed as the headers are assumed to be non-null. The GetContentTypeValue method now directly uses the HasContentType method without an additional null check.

Additionally, a spelling error in the method documentation has been corrected. The word 'serch' has been corrected to 'search'.
to adhere to the naming conventions for static members. This change doesn't affect the functionality of the code but makes it more consistent with common C# coding standards.
This commit includes an optimization to the GetMinValue and GetMaxValue methods in the code:

1. The enum values were being enumerated multiple times in the original implementation of these methods, which could lead to inefficiency.

2. To address this, the enum values are now converted to a list immediately after retrieval. This forces immediate execution of the query and stores the results in memory. As a result, the enumeration only happens once when the list is created, and subsequent operations like First() and Last() are performed on the in-memory list, not the original enumeration.

This change improves the efficiency of these methods without affecting their functionality.
@VahidFarahmandian
Copy link
Owner

@VahidFarahmandian VahidFarahmandian added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 26, 2024
@AlrzAmini
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlrzAmini Alireza would you please sign your commits? https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification

I've now signed my GPG key, but at the time of the commits, I didn't have it. Do I need to resend my pull request?

@VahidFarahmandian
Copy link
Owner

@AlrzAmini Alireza would you please sign your commits? https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification

I've now signed my GPG key, but at the time of the commits, I didn't have it. Do I need to resend my pull request?

No need to resend PR. I have merged it with the code base. 🌹

@VahidFarahmandian VahidFarahmandian merged commit dd60b46 into VahidFarahmandian:main Jul 27, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants