Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Augment activity_id to provide description with identifier #397

Closed
durack1 opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Augment activity_id to provide description with identifier #397

durack1 opened this issue Aug 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@durack1
Copy link
Member

durack1 commented Aug 30, 2017

Augment activity_id to be self-describing, following full descriptions at https://www.wcrp-climate.org/modelling-wgcm-mip-catalogue/modelling-wgcm-cmip6-endorsed-mips e.g.

{
   "activity_id":{
      "AerChemMIP":"Aerosols and Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project",
      "C4MIP":"Coupled Climate Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project",
      "CFMIP":"Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project",
      "CMIP":"CMIP DECK: 1pctCO2, abrupt4xCO2, amip, esm-piControl, esm-historical, historical, and piControl experiments",
...
}
@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Aug 31, 2017

@momipsl, @markelkington, @martinjuckes, @MartinaSt, @ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL will it impact any of you if we make the change noted above, and similar changes captured in #396 and #395?

We have noted that the identifiers are not self-describing, and converting this information to a dictionary, with both key and description provides more context

@taylor13

@MartinaSt
Copy link

@durack1 Thanks for asking: source_type and grid_label are no problem for the citation. In case of activity_id there might be a minor change in the insert script required but this is no problem.

@markelkington
Copy link

markelkington commented Sep 4, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants