Rust does NOT monomorphize it's static generic items. This means you cannot use a generic static item in a generic function. You'll get the following error:
error[E0401]: can't use generic parameters from outer function
That's pretty frustrating when you want to write a singleton pattern that rely's on a generic parameter. This crate allows for this pattern with minimal runtime overhead.
generic_singleton
uses anymap behind the scenes to store a map of each
generic type. The first time you hit the get_or_init
macro we initialize the
singleton. Subsequent calls to get_or_init
will retrieve the singleton from
the map.
use std::{ops::AddAssign, sync::RwLock};
use num_traits::{One, Zero};
fn generic_call_counter<T: Zero + One + Copy + AddAssign + Send + Sync + 'static>() -> T {
let mut count = generic_singleton::get_or_init!(|| RwLock::new(T::zero())).write().unwrap();
*count += T::one();
*count
}
fn main() {
// Works with usize
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<usize>(), 1);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<usize>(), 2);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<usize>(), 3);
// Works with i32
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<i32>(), 1);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<i32>(), 2);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<i32>(), 3);
// Works with f32
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<f32>(), 1.0);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<f32>(), 2.0);
assert_eq!(generic_call_counter::<f32>(), 3.0);
}
The example shown above has a drawback of requiring an RwLock
to ensure
synchronisation around the inner AnyMap. In single-threaded situations we can
remove this lock and provide mutable references directly using the
get_or_init_thread_local!
macro. This comes at the cost of ergonomics,
requiring you to express your logic in a closure rather than simply returning a
reference.