Use \prg_new_conditional:Nnn to define \@@_if_option:n
#289
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Witiko
added
technical debt
Witiko
force-pushed
the
fix/use-prg-instead-of-cs
branch
from
b271019
to
8af0033
Compare
Witiko
force-pushed
the
fix/use-prg-instead-of-cs
branch
from
8af0033
to
9299fe3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, we used
\cs_new:Nnto define the conditional function\@@_if_option:nTF. This works, but it does not allow us to automatically generate other variants of\@@_if_option:nTFsuch as\@@_if_option:nTand\@@_if_option_p:n. This pull request changes\cs_new:Nnto\prg_new_conditional:Nnn, which allows us to automatically generate other variants of\@@_if_option:nTF.